PersonPro-Fascist Anti-War Campaigner
Smelly hippy and useful idiot, Brian Haw-Haw has broadcast his pro-fascist propaganda from his camp in Parliament Square for much of the last six years.
Like much of the anti-war Left, his failure to grasp the fact that Terrorists Are Bad has caused him to verbally attack Saint Anthony of Good Faith and to offend Decent Parliamentarians with his silly placards about dead Iraqis.
Beloved figure of latte-sipping, bruschetta-munching Hampstead Liberals, who congregate in snooty galleries to view his simplistic sloganeering, before gang-pissing on photographs of Iraqi Democrats and howling ululations for the Islamification of Britain, leaving Decent Observer journalists to seethe at their own frustrated impotence.
See also, What's Left?, Nick Cohen
27 comments:
Surely the impotence of Decent journalists is not, as you seem to suggest, self-inflicted? Is it not down to the fact that the guacamole-munching, Dhimmi elites who would have the West sleepwalking to disaster have made it impossible for the still, small voice of those who Get It to be heard?
Exactly - it's the kind of thing that leaves Decent observer journalists seething at their own frustrated impotence.
How is Brian Haw pro-fascist? BY DEFINITION, FASCISM IS THE CONVERGENCE OF CORPORATE AND GOVERNMENT INTERESTS. The war in Iraq is fascist in its purest form. I think you misplaced your Oxford Dictionary Nick, rather embarassing, cardinal sin for a paid-up establishment writer I'd say...
Who would attack a committed Christian who has slept outside for 6 six years? Answer: paid cointelpro. At the end of the day, you're serving your masters. Pathetic career.
You're both wrong - you're all fascists. In fact, just about everybody is except me, Nick, Norm and Marko Attilla Hoare.
Go on, do one you pair of nazis.
Thaks Nick, you pretty much proved my point there. Well done old chap.
You types are so transparent, pretending to be gate keepers(of what one can't really say). It's quite funny watching your teenaged avatar-role playing, safe from having to talk about real issues.
Nazis? Yep, they're in control of Washington and built Langley.
You will just sit there and keep on snickering.
You types...
Don't like the sound of that, sounds a bit suspicious...
http://decentpedia.blogspot.com/2007/08/suspicious.html
...Now, I'm off to continue ruling the world from behind the scenes using my Lizardoid psychic powers.
Ah ha! Merrily calling folk Fascists, and now Nazis – is the last gasp of either when outed. Again, yawn, more DISINFO! Thanks for the confirmation, pal. http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/_/viewer.aspx?path=hut&name=1818n072.jpg .
Moreover – you appear to be working directly from Hermann Göring's script, "Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. ...Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. [NOTE!] All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
Pity you are paid by otherwise repeatable/reputable publications and you ought to contemplate what happened to Herr Göring and Co. once the long arm of the law dealt with them at Nürnberg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials .
Anon (Can’t be too careful with bloodthirsty crypto-nazi’s DISINFORMATIONISTS like you running around and spouting off – huh?)
PS. There’s only one ‘L’ in Attila.
Sighs, rubs eyes
Let me say this one last time...
No, you're the fascist. Now just admit it - your weasel words have been exposed as lies, and your secret nazi-fluffing laid bare for the world to see.
Just quit it, Adolf. You're wrong.
Sure. Go look up STRAW MAN, pretend to read it(we know you don't know what it means anyway), and then note that when it actually comes to arguing actual facts, all you can employ to defend your Hampstead-based fake liberal edifice... are Straw Men.
Poor Nick, go on, amuse yourself, avoid facing real issues and facts, or just carry on with a worthless contribution to culture. The pro-war left is as fake a club as there ever was.
And collect your paycheck.
Patrick
Patrick, Anonymous, you are embarrassing yourselves. Some day you will thank me for removing your cretinous nonsense.
We get it completely and you are full of shite. You can give it, but can't take it. Exposure FOR YOU is indeed "embarrassing" because you can't stand the truth and have to resort to censorship. Now, MM/NC, RE: Brian Haw: apologise and/or retract.
Nice pithy try, 'Malky'. However, be well advised that vapid pond scum can’t condescend(to anyone nor anywhere).
RE: Malky … hmmm.
FIND: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=malky
AND http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malky
Who are you kidding – tough guy ?
ROFLMAO!
OTOH: OK then, let's see here:
1. A right-winger for The War Against Terror is a NeoCON. AKA - crypto-fascist.
2. A left-winger for The War Against Terror is a crypto-communist. AKA - Closet Stalinist.
And fat paycheques, of course, have no loyalty whatsoever.
That makes sense, boy.
Nick Cohen, the fact you removed my comments is proves my(censored) points well enough.
Thank you for that clarification. See you at the Groucho!!
You, de Havilland and buddies in your movement(which totals 9 worldwide), like every anti-Arab racist and neo-conservative, will be denying you were pro-war by the time the dust clears.
A self-styled meaningless identity, born out of a public school boy desire to be "different"... what a meaningless and pathetic excuse for a writer's existence.
I may have to out you to the web community now, so you can't hide in the shadow of a fake name. Could hurt book sales, when your publisher gets wind of that...
... Oh no(You will appear very uncool at the Groucho)!
Fine, if that's the way you want it.
This is a comedy blog satirising the verbal and mental tics of the pro-war left. The post you're both complaining about is a joke.
I've refrained from telling you this because a) it's crashingly obvious and b) I suspect that at least one of you is a Harry's Place commenter playing the cunt for giggles.
You would've realised this if you'd bothered checking the rest of the site - instead, you've made yourselves look a right pair of tits.
Don't say I didn't try to stop you, because I did.
If you say so... Indeed I have spent more time than I care to mention checking out the rest of your site before, the site doesn't appear to be an all comedy blog satirising the pro-war left- and the hit-piece on Brian Haw... if you say that's satire, then it's surely too twisted to be just that.
I'm not convinced you are what you say you are, but you produced a nice get out of jail card there, so I am curious as to why...
Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of satirical role playing.
With all the priviledged self-styled pundits and the alcoholic Hitchens-types swirling around the blogworld, one woul have forgotten that there are innocent people dying in Iraq for no reason other than they were born in the wrong country...
Even Brian Haw has a grip on this, he is there 24/7 so you and I can sip our lattes on Sun morning.
Tits for tats for self-serving advocates of The War Against Terror (T.W.A.T.)? Great fun? Hmmm.
It’s an ‘easy out’, isn’t it, whislt 2007 has already been the deadliest year for the ‘coalition of the easily led’?
Patrick’s called it about right.
Considering Messer Haw doesn’t even have e-comms, thus unable to rebut throughout his lonely and heroic vigil against never-ending war plus the debt slavery wrought for the foreseeable future, said ‘satire’ is rather: a. shallow, b. crass and c. hardly funny – to all but the most twisted and insensitive.
War? Wot war, mate? I don’t see no war. Do you? Even the mighty BBC CORPORATION (Leftist? – Ha, ha and ha) seems to have NEO-CONveniently forgotten.
How the ‘new left’ (and ‘old left’, now in Parliament, that voted FOR war) embraced Swampie over a few trees, but shuns Brian’s stand against the new DU genocide – simply because of his faith. It is agreed – that smacks of cowardice and duplicity.
Sarcasm has its place and free speech means FREED SPEECH now. Alas and perchance NC/MM grasp the concepts of fair play and the shoe on the other foot? Doubtful, but we oft struggle in vain and live in hope.
Brian has made a more powerful and telling statement and case than the entire ‘left’ put together. Once upon a time over a million had the chance to bring bags of food and join him for as long as possible, but scurried off when TOLD to go ...
OK, NC/MM, in the spirit of Brian’s faith and the Season, we may forgive you – for you know not what you do(?) … but can’t speak for the Almighty. That’s up to you.
Speaking of forgiveness and giving freely, maybe you ought to do a piece on fines and/or jail-time for ‘stealing’ freely given, or leaked, WiFi … so Brian can’t rebut and broadcast live with … FREE SPEECH … from said Parliament Square? Imagine broadcasting and blogs from Brian and friends, “LIVE FROM PARLIAMENT SQUARE! IT’S THE ANTI-WAR NETWORK! Skype-in for FREE globally and have your un-censored say!” Oh dear ...
That (like unrestricted WORDS, LIVE VISUALS AND SOUND), without doubt, rattles: “the not-so-great-nor-good”, the presstitutes and teleCONS – plus the mighty BEEB to the core.
Head-to-head with Radio 4’s Parliament Live, maybe even split screen …How about: I’m A Politician – Get Me Out Of Here?
You know, as bad is it gets in the blog world, it should never be so bad that it comes to this:
www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/DocView.asp?did=1000279585&fid=1725
Now that's deadly serious, with far-reaching effects. The intelligencia should be fighting battles like this instead of wasting time on satire.
Under this new precedent set by our heroes at Google, even Brian Haw could have you in court. Or anyone could have anyone, for that matter...
What's Left? Plenty by the looks of it.
As old Ted Turner once said, "either lead, follow, or get the **%! out of the way."
I find it portentous when people lose the ability to laugh at themselves. Especially when they are guilty of such gross (or malicious, wilful) misrepresentation as that of Patrick and anonymous. Personally. I love your work Malky. It makes me chuckle.
Harry's place is the domain of discretely racist imperialism. A more sordidly earnest advocation of white man's burden I've yet to encounter.
Post a Comment