Noun
Fah-Shizz-Zum
1. Extremely nationalistic, often right wing, authoritarian ideology or system of government, commonly characterised by:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- Strict adherence to the whims and diktats of a central authority figure, who is held to embody the virtue and power of the nation;
- Belief in one's own nation and system of government as the pinnacle of human endeavour, and the desire to impose it upon others;
- Officially endorsed scaremongering and dehumanisation of selected minority ethnic groups, who are held to be a threat to the very existence of the nation - declarations of hatred and contempt for foreigners, who are commonly regarded as weak, effeminate and in need of strong leadership.
- Domestically - extreme militarism and glorification of the armed forces and the use of violence. Extra-territorially - aggressive actions against those declared to threaten the interests of the state;
- Demands for slavish obedience to illogical and repugnant political ideologies, as espoused by central authority figures;
- Murder, torture, extra-judicial imprisonment and detention camps, enacted by a central authority that is unbound and unchecked by laws, processes or opposing political forces;
- Attempts to delete inconvenient facts from the historical record;
- The dissemination of officially endorsed propaganda glorifying the strength of central authority figures who are vital to the defense of the nation, while denigrating and dehumanising all opposition.
------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Any person or action offending the sensibilities of Muscular Liberals.
Disambiguation - Not to be confused with objectively Pro-Fascist, which is used to describe any person or action not furthering the use of violence against Fascists.
Sunday, 7 October 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
My guess is that your next topic will be "Weasel words" focusing on people who date not say the words "Islamo-fascism"
'Objectively' on its own could be the subject of an essay.
But could such an essay be written objectively?
Malky seems to have forgotten the footnotes again. So here is a link to something about fascism that George Orwell prepared earlier (also featuring Trotsky and trotsky-fascism).
http://libcom.org/library/spilling-the-spanish-beans-george-orwell
As it happens, Anon, I've read that before - not enough bashing of traitorous liberals, if you ask me.
So can I look forward to a new eye-catching initiative such as "Muscular Liberalism Against the Liberals"?
Goood reading this post
Post a Comment